A while back Schwinn hit the wall on increasing sales through their boutique dealers, so they examined the idea of entering the mass market…Wal-Mart, etc. Just like many of us have done when we decide to expand distribution or retail presence in hope of picking up additional revenue.
Here’s what they decided to do; build a new model for the mass market. Sounds familiar doesn’t it? Leave the prestige brand in the boutiques, but sell a cheaper model in Wal-Mart. How many of us have done that, or at least considered it? A lot, I’ll bet.
However, there are indeed consequences to every action in life. Schwinn proceeded to lose over 1700 of their dealers (out of 3,000). Of course the company claimed that those remaining dealers sold 80% of the bikes. On the face of it, at least, I am in full agreement with the principle. I think the execution was botched:
They could have done it better: establish a new line with a new name, i.e. BullRider built by Schwinn. Calm the established “boutique” channel by pro-actively approaching the channel partners and telling them your plans in advance. This helps you hold your channel together while you take the heat. Market the heck out of BullRider in the print media that is read by your target customers (figure out what Wal-Mart buyers read, probably TV Guide). Let normal attrition diminish your boutique dealers over the next year or two. Increase the level of support to your remaining boutique dealers, with some sort of value-add…maybe sales training classes paid for by Schwinn, or Schwinn paid-for in-store selling events, etc. Hold tight to your current channel by marketing the top line upwards. Build partner loyalty by showing your loyalty to them (with money, as there’s no finer way). That’s the right way.
I suggested a similar program to a guitar manufacturer a few years ago. They rejected the recommendation. They continue to languish. Too freaking bad.